Sunday, October 19, 2008

Legal action might be the only option - Kapil

Top Curve
New innovations at ICL?

  • Kapil Dev said the umpire review system, which the ICC is now trialling, was started by the ICL. They also have some more innovations in the pipeline. "We also plan to award nine runs for a 90-yard hit," he said. "And we are thinking about abolishing overthrows if there is a direct hit while going for a run-out."
Bottom Curve

Kapil Dev, the ICL chairman, has said taking legal action would be the only option left if the ICC doesn't respond to the league's bid for official recognition at its next board meeting, possibly in November. The ICL had issued a letter to the ICC to convene a board meeting after the talks with the BCCI failed.

"I think we are on very good ground as far as a legal case goes," Kapil said. "Eventually we will do that [take legal action]. "We are not the ones who are enforcing bans on players or umpires."

Subhash Chandra, chairman of the Essel Group, which owns the ICL, and Himanshu Mody, the league's business head, had met BCCI president Shashank Manohar and N Srinivasan, the board's secretary, in New Delhi but the talks barely lasted 15-20 minutes and they failed to arrive at a common ground.

Manohar met officials of the ICL for the first time since the league was set up in April 2007 after its request for recognition came up for discussion at the ICC board meeting in Dubai earlier this month. It was decided at that meeting that Manohar would provide a written report to the ICC board "in due course" after discussions with the ICL.

Kapil said he was unhappy with the way the talks were conducted. "I wasn't there but I believe they said 'you shut down the ICL then we will talk'. There is no point in talking after that. We will now wait for 21 days to decide our future plan of action."

ICL 20-20 Indian Championship, 2008/09

ICL 20-20 Indian Championship, 2008/09
TEAMMPWLTNRNRRPTS
Royal Bengal Tigers 3 3 0 0 0 +1.124 6

Hyderabad Heroes 2 2 0 0 0 +0.917 4
Chennai Superstars 3 2 1 0 0 +0.884 4
Chandigarh Lions 2 2 0 0 0 +0.313 4
Lahore Badshahs 3 1 2 0 0 -0.079 2
Delhi Giants 2 1 1 0 0 -0.550 2
Ahmedabad Rockets 4 1 3 0 0 -0.726 2
Dhaka Warriors 2 0 2 0 0 -0.719 0
Mumbai Champs 3 0 3 0 0 -0.725 0

Batting Records in ICL

Batting Records in ICL



Statistics In 20s In 50s
Most Runs Ganapathi Vignesh (697) Jai Prakash Yadav (387)
Best Average Shane Bond (50) Dheeraj Jadhav (77.75)
Best Strike Rate Azhar Mahmood (174.19) Abhinav Bali (129.57)
Most 100s Alok Kapali (1) Abhishek Jhunjhunwala (1)
Most 50s Ambati Rayudu (4) Jai Prakash Yadav (3)
Most Sixes Ganapathi Vignesh (31) Hemang Badani (14)
Most Fours Ganapathi Vignesh (79) Abhinav Bali (33)
Most Ducks Chris Harris (4) Baburao Yadav (2)
Highest Individual Score Alok Kapali (100) Monish Mishra (122*)
Most Sixes in an Inning Imran Farhat (8) Abhinav Bali (6)
Most Fours in an Inning Dinesh Mongia (9) Abhishek Jhunjhunwala (9)
Highest Score on Debut Wavell Hinds (59) Abhishek Jhunjhunwala (104)

Published Date: Oct 19, 2008

Friday, October 17, 2008

ganguly's spectacular career

The Ganguly story in numbers

After his 12-year international career, the stats indicate that Sourav Ganguly has largely fulfilled the potential that was obvious in his Test debut


S Rajesh

October 10, 2008




With more than 18,000 international runs under his belt, Sourav Ganguly is among the finest cricketers to play for India © AFP

When Sourav Ganguly first made his presence felt in international cricket, with two hundreds in successive Tests in England, there was every indication that Indian cricket had unveiled a batting giant. Twelve years later the numbers indicate that he has largely fulfilled his potential: as a one-day player he can easily be counted among the best, and though his Test record isn't as glittering, it's still one that he can be very satisfied about. Add his dynamic captaincy, which brought India unprecedented Test success, and it's clear that Ganguly has had an international career he can be mighty satisfied about.

If there's some regret, it'll be that in Test cricket he didn't quite shine with the same incandescence as two other big names he has always been associated with - Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid. In his first 30 Tests, there was every indication that Ganguly was pushing towards greatness in Tests too, as he averaged more than 50 in his first three years. In the next 20 games, though, he slumped so badly that his overall average plummeted to 41, which is where it plateaued through the rest of his career.

Break-up of Ganguly's Test career
Period Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
First 30 Tests 50 2281 50.68 7/ 11
Next 20 Tests 36 874 27.31 0/ 4
Next 59 Tests 94 3733 42.42 8/ 19
Career 180 6888 41.74 15/ 34

Around the time his Test form dipped, however, his performances in ODIs soared: between October 1999 and June 2002, Ganguly scored 11 centuries and 18 fifties in 76 games, averaging more than 49 at a strike-rate of nearly 80. After that, though, the numbers tapered off, with only four centuries in his last 116 matches, and none since the 2003 World Cup.

Break-up of Ganguly's ODI career
Period Runs Average Srike rate 100s/ 50s
First 119 games 4255 40..52 69.81 7/ 28
Next 76 games 3446 49.22 79.71 11/ 18
Last 116 games 3662 35.90 73.26 4/ 26
Career 11,363 41.02 73.70 22/ 72

The ODI match-winner
When Ganguly scored runs in ODIs, India usually ended up on the winning side. Batting at the top of the order was a huge advantage, and Ganguly made it count, averaging more than 55 in ODIs that India won. Those are numbers that put him in elite company: among batsmen who scored at least 2500 runs in wins, only five have a higher average. Eighteen of his 22 centuries came in victories, which converts into an impressive percentage of 81.82.

Batsmen with highest averages in wins in ODIs since 1995 (Qual: at least 2500 runs in wins)
Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Brian Lara 99 4701 66.21 90.84 12/ 29
Michael Bevan 144 4190 65.46 75.98 5/ 31
Sachin Tendulkar 159 8163 60.46 91.27 27/ 39
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 97 3575 57.66 76.70 5/ 27
Mohammad Yousuf 157 6218 57.57 78.57 14/ 40
Sourav Ganguly 149 6938 55.06 77.87 18/ 41
Nathan Astle 92 4254 54.53 77.41 14/ 26
Saeed Anwar 92 4308 54.53 84.57 9/ 30

Last-innings survivor
His Test stats are less impressive, but there's one area where he has topped Tendulkar, Gundappa Viswanath, VVS Laxman and Mohammad Azharuddin. In the fourth innings, Ganguly averages 36.43 - not a particularly remarkable stat in itself, but quite notable when compared to the figures that the other Indians have posted. Tendulkar only averages 33.12 in the last innings, and Laxman 30.04. Among Indian batsmen, Ganguly's numbers are bettered only by Sunil Gavaskar and Dravid.

India's batsmen in fourth innings of Tests (Qual: at least 20 innings)
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Sunil Gavaskar 33 1398 58.25 4/ 8
Rahul Dravid 42 1288 47.70 1/ 9
Sourav Ganguly 31 838 36.43 1/ 3
Gundappa Viswanath 24 668 33.40 1/ 4
Sachin Tendulkar 44 1060 33..12 2/ 3
Mohammad Azharuddin 22 610 32.10 2/ 1
VVS Laxman 26 631 30.04 0/ 4
Dilip Vengsarkar 25 613 29.19 1/ 3

Partners in run-making
In his first Test, Ganguly stitched together partnerships of 64 and 94 with Tendulkar and Dravid, and these two batsmen remained his most prolific partners. Of the 38 century partnerships he was involved in, 21 came with either Tendulkar or Dravid.

Ganguly's partnerships with the big three in Tests
Player Innings Runs Average stand 100/ 50 stands
Sachin Tendulkar 68 3990 61.38 11/ 16
Rahul Dravid 67 3245 53.19 10/ 12
VVS Laxman 38 1570 41.31 5/ 6

The story is similar in ODIs, though the numbers are even more impressive. The average partnership with Dravid was slightly higher, but with Tendulkar he amassed 8227 runs, which is easily a record for most runs by a pair. For the first wicket the two added 6609 runs, another record.

Ganguly's partnerships with Tendulkar, Dravid and Sehwag in ODIs
Player Innings Runs Average stand 100s/ 50s
Rahul Dravid 88 4363 50.14 11/ 18
Sachin Tendulkar 176 8227 47.55 26/ 29
Virender Sehwag 65 2606 42.03 7/ 11

King of spin
Ganguly penchant for slow bowling, especially of the left-arm variety, is well known, and the table below bears out just how good a player of spinners he was. He averaged more than 48 against them in Tests since 2002, and almost 65 against left-armers. That figure would have been even higher had Brad Hogg not dismissed him four times when India toured Australia in 2007-08.

Ganguly against different bowling styles in Tests (since Jan 1, 2002)
Bowling style Runs Balls Dismissals Average
Pace 2295 4185 58 39.57
Spin 1403 2573 29 48.38
Left-arm spin 713 1198 11 64.81

Leading leader
Ganguly did plenty as a batsman, but arguably his contribution as captain was even greater. His record of 21 wins and 13 defeats in 49 Tests gives him a win-loss ratio of 1.61, which is the best among all Indian captains who have led in at least 25 Tests. Dravid is next with a ratio of 1.33.

Even more impressive, though, is Ganguly's record in overseas Tests: in 28 games he led India to 11 wins, which is almost 37% of all overseas victories by the team. (Click here and scroll to the bottom to see the entire list and here for his record as ODI captain.)

Comparing India's captains (Qual: led in at least 25 Tests)
Captain Tests captained Won Lost Win-loss ratio
Sourav Ganguly 49 21 13 1.61
Rahul Dravid 25 8 6 1.33
Sunil Gavaskar 47 9 8 1.12
Mohammad Azharuddin 47 14 14 1.00
Kapil Dev 34 4 7 0.57
MAK Pataudi 40 9 19 0.47
Sachin Tendulkar 25 4 9 0.44

The one glaring black mark in his stats is his record in both forms of the game against the leading team in the world: in ODIs against Australia he averages 25.43, with one century in 23 innings; in Tests the average is 31.73, with one hundred in 36 innings. He won't get an opportunity to rectify his ODI numbers, but over the next month he'll hope he can improve his Test stats significantly.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Cricket Masala: Harbhajan against Australia


The Bad Boy of Team India


The turbunator of Team India Harbhajan Singh is looking forward to some quality pitches, quality balls and zero misbehaviour in the forthcoming Inda vs Australia cricket test series. The four match Test series starts on October 9.

"Yes, I'm sick of all the bad-boy crap," Harbhajan said.

"I've no interest in hearing about how controversies follow me wherever I go," he said. "I'm going to stay away from all that."

Harbhajan even mentioned about learning from past mistakes and trekking the road no taken.

"It's always important to learn from your mistakes. I've learnt my lessons, good and bad; the good things teach you stuff as well."

In case you didn't already know of Harbhajan Singh's hot temper, Harbhajan was was slappeda ban for the racial abuse of Andrew Symonds during the astoundingly ridiculous Sydney Test match in January 2008. Team India threatened walk away from the series if he wasn't absolved.

During the IPL series Harbhajan got into some more hot water after he slapped fast bowler Sreesanth. He was suspended for 5 ODIs.

Harbhajan also talked about his long rivalry and undeniable fear of Australian Captain Ricky Ponting.

"I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Ponting will struggle some more and keep his record in India intact. Otherwise, he is such a strong player that if he gets going, he just keeps going."

IPL pads up for Bangkok meet




A possible player transfer window around December and a player auction in January may be on the cards ahead of the next season scheduled for April 10-May 29 © AFP

The future shape of the IPL will be decided in Bangkok over the next three days when league officials and representatives of the eight franchises meet to discuss several issues that will impact those involved. The issues include a possible upward revision in the US$5-million purchase cap for cricketers, a change in the limit of foreign players in a team and the fluctuating dollar rate that could affect player payments by some franchises.

While "kicking off the next season" of the hugely successful Twenty20 tournament, the meeting from October 17-19, the first of its kind after the hugely-successful first edition in April-June this year, will also finalise details of a possible player transfer window around December and a player auction in January ahead of the next season scheduled for April 10- May 29.

Lalit Modi, the IPL chairman, said the meeting would "address a range of issues including a review of the last tournament and share the experiences of various stakeholders". He, however, did not discuss the details of the meeting, except to clarify that "nothing has been finalised on the salary cap" and that the franchises were bound to honour their contracts with players.

"At this point, all I can say is that there will be many suggestions and any decision will be taken only at the meeting," said Niranjan Shah, the previous BCCI secretary and IPL's new vice-chairman.

Franchise representatives said they would discuss a proposal to raise the salary cap by US$2 million to help them gain from the next player auction with the availablity of more players from abroad, notably England. "Most of the teams, except Jaipur (it spent only US$ 3.3 million and picked up most of its players in the second, lesser-value auction), have neared the US$5-million cap already and can't spend any more on new players. Besides, the transfer window could see a lot of action and teams will look to have some cash in hand to spend on players who are available," said a franchise representative.

Top Curve
Most wanted

  • Rise in salary cap for players by US$2 million, to help franchises gain from the next player auction by adding more value to their squad
  • Decision on the fate of 'unwanted' players - do they remain in the squad or are they moved to a transfer pool so other franchises can still buy new players?
  • A solution to the dollar-rupee situation which was originally pegged at Rs 40 to the US dollar and has led to an almost 20% difference in the value of foreign players
  • Increase in number of foreign players in a squad to 10 which may help accomodate players from England
Bottom Curve

Another proposal to increase the number of foreign players in a squad, currently around eight or nine per team, to 10, may also be considered.

The discussion on the transfer window will also decide the fate of "unwanted" players - those who have not performed in the first edition or those who do not fit into the franchises' gameplan for the next. "If a franchise tries to sell a player but has no takers, even at a reduced price, does he remain in the squad or is he moved to a transfer pool so other franchises can still buy new players?," a representative said. "The franchise will still need to pay the player as most players have three-year contracts."

Another concern for the franchises would be the exchange rate situation which has led to an almost 20% difference in the value of foreign players. Also, while some franchises have been paying their foreign players in rupees, converted later to dollars, with Rs 40 as the conversion rate, a falling rupee has meant those players getting less than the original guaranteed sum in dollars.

"The problem lies in the two sets of contracts are in force for the IPL. While foreign players have signed 'dollar contracts' the Indian players contracts' are in rupee terms. The contentious point is that the franchise-IPL agreement specifies US$ 40 as the basis of all payments, while the franchise-player contracts are silent on the conversion rate," a representative said.

Officials associated with the IPL, however, maintained that if the franchise had signed a dollar contract, it was bound to stick to the terms, irrespective of the rate. "Besides, this is an issue that can cut both ways. What if the dollar drops to Rs 36, won't the franchises stand to gain?" an official said.

Though the franchises dismissed talks of forming an association to put forward their views forcefully before the IPL governing council, they will be expecting a lot of answers in Bangkok which will be key to their strategies as they pad up for another season of the IPL.

Talks with ICL 'have failed' - BCCI

Talks between the BCCI and the ICL have failed, a statement from the Indian board has said, putting a question mark over the league's bid for official recognition. The terse statement did not offer any reason but said there were no plans for any further meetings.

N Srinivasan, BCCI secretary, said the two sides "failed to arrive at a common ground" during their meeting in New Delhi.

ICL officials, however, could not be reached for comment. The league was represented by Kapil Dev, the chairman of the ICL board, and business head Himanshu Mody.

The Indian board agreed to meet officials of the unsanctioned ICL, for the first time since the league was set up in April 2007, after its request for recognition came up for discussion at the ICC board meeting in Dubai earlier this week.

Since its inception, the ICL has been strong opposition from the BCCI, which has banned players associated with the league from all forms of official cricket and barred them from using any of its facilities. The ICL has, meanwhile, been pressing the ICC unsuccessfully for official recognition of their venture for several months. Subsequently they requested the ICC for a meeting, and Subhash Chandra, who owns the league, met David Morgan, the ICC president, in London last week to present its case.

The ICC board adjourned a decision on the ICL at its meeting in Dubai, asking BCCI president Shashank Manohar to conduct talks with the officials from the league.